The most common word I hear being used to describe the Millennials is “entitled”. This view, almost always put forward by Baby Boomers, has become so mainstream that Millennials’ narcissism even became a cover story in Time. The narrative seems to revolve around the ideas that a) Millennials use technology—and particularly social media—a lot (and that’s allegedly a narcissistic activity) b) Millennials are ambitious—they want to do interesting jobs and get promoted, and c) Millennials aren’t working hard (like we used to).
To me, these criticisms don’t actually seem much like criticisms. Rather, to me, it feels like the Baby Boomers are trying to make themselves feel better about their own weaknesses. Boomers as a whole don’t understand or enjoy technology and social media, so, to feel good about themselves, they have to criticize those that do. Boomers made the decision to work their lives away in boring jobs, so, to validate that decision, they need to criticize those who desire a different path.
I (a Gen Xer) think the Millennials aren’t particularly entitled, and actually deserve far more credit than the older generations have given them.
Who’s really entitled?
The Baby Boomers who are accusing the Millennials of being entitled grew up during what’s called the “long boom”, the post-World War II economic expansion. When Trump says, “Make America Great Again”, he actually means “make America grow the way it did in the 1960s”.
Why? Because the economy was exploding. Because growing up then was so easy.
The GDP was rising 4-5% during the long boom. Jobs were plentiful—the unemployment rate actually hit a ridiculously low 3.4% rate in 1968. To go to college at UPenn in 1965, the estimated cost including room and board was $3,170. At the time, the median family income was $6,900. Today, the estimated cost to go to college at UPenn is $65,470, while the median US family income is $55,775.
UPenn is just one school, but in general, education costs have increased at a far greater rate than both inflation and incomes. What’s more, while the average American student today graduates with debt over $30,000, federally-administered student loans were only legislated into existence in 1965.
Adjust your contrast
So the baby boomers grew up in a time where education was cheap and student debt rare. When they graduated, they had few problems finding a job in the booming economy.
In contrast, Millennials are going deeply into debt to fund their education with no guarantee of a job when they graduate. The job market has been terrible for much of their adult life. In 2013, when the Time article was written, the average unemployment rate was 7.4%, while the youth unemployment rate was closer to 15%. Plenty of Millennials are taking on huge amounts of debt going to college, but often discover when they graduate that the only job they can find involves pouring coffee.
Now, someone does need to pour coffee. But pouring coffee isn’t a great way to pay off tens of thousands of dollars of student loans.
How about housing?
A similar thing has happened with housing. I don’t have housing data for 1960s, but it’s certainly true that the American dream was to own a detached house. And, in large, that dream seems to have been realized.
The Millennials, on the other hand, don’t get the house. In 1984, houses in Toronto cost about 1.6 times the annual income. In 2012, the multiple was up to six, and today in Vancouver, the multiple is above ten.
In fact, in Vancouver, a Millennial is hard-pressed even to rent. The median income is around $80K or about $61K after tax, while the median annual rent on a 2-bedroom apartment is about $38,400, or about 63% of after-tax income. Of course, Millennials, just starting their career, will typically be nowhere near the median income.
So, the Baby Boomer got their cheap education, their good job out of school, and a nice detached house at a cheap price. The Millennial, on the other hand, ends up with tens of thousands of dollars of student loans and has to struggle to rent a terrible apartment while working as a barista.
And the Boomers call the Millennials entitled because they want more than that.
My big question
Thus, the question I have isn’t why the Millennials are entitled, but rather why they’re not more bitter. They’ve really been screwed by the Boomers.
The Boomers felt entitled to tax cuts. To get those tax cuts, they drastically cut and privatized funding for education, leading to Millennials’ huge student debts.
The Boomers took on piles of debt to speculate on housing. Then, when those speculations caused a housing crash, it trashed the economy, making it far more difficult for Millennials to get jobs.
To ensure that Boomers kept their jobs despite destroying the economy, they kept interest rates super-low for a decade, causing a housing bubble that’s made it impossible for Millennials to afford a place to live.
Now, education funding, employment rates, and housing prices are complex issues. But, to my way of seeing things, the Boomers are more responsible than anyone for the horrible situation that the Millennials have inherited. I’m ashamed of them when they turn around and call the Millennials entitled.
To me, the Boomers act far more entitled than the Millennials, and it shocks me that the Millennials aren’t furious about this state of affairs.
But then again, maybe they are, but you just don’t hear about it. Because most of the media is owned by Baby Boomers.
3 thoughts on “The Most Entitled Generation”
The Boomers did try to build a more resilient society in the form of the ‘Hippie’ movement. But, the larger society would have none of it. It had a war to promote and, later,economists, who promoted building for the wealthy through reducing taxes. Reduce taxes? That’s got to be a good thing. Go for it.
Yeah, reducing taxes is a good thing, all else being equal, but all else is never equal, and economists never seem to consider that. For instance, it seems obvious to me that it’s better for the economy having an extra $1000 in the hands of a poor person who will spend it than in the hands of a really wealthy person who won’t. That’s what taxes do.
In general, the right seems to ignore the Laffer curve, and believe that trickle down economics works, when it clearly doesn’t. Supply is rarely the bottleneck in today’s society. Demand is. If the demand is there, someone will figure out how to make the supply. (Supply = rich investors, Demand = The broad population. You need the broad population to have money to incentivize the growth of supply.)
agree , the world has shifted to the right politically, and society doesn’t seem to understand how far right. It’s not possible to have a mainstream conversation about something like Naomi Klein’s LEAP manifesto.To speak of such things is to be labelled an extremist. Reminds me of the fifities! I think there are a great many baby boomers who are not doing well in their old age. The idea that people need support in their old age has come and gone along with the idea that the government should take care of its people. Support for the disabled is stagnant. I think baby boomers who grew up with such hope, the promise that the world is their oyster, are as surprised as anyone. It’s not what they had in mind!